Logical Reasoning: Causal Reasoning
The single most common argument on the section: an arrow claimed between two events, and the four other pictures that fit the very same data.
8 topics · 33 questions
Each topic is a path, not a menu: work down it in order and every question builds on the one above. Click any of them to watch the answer draw itself.
What a Causal Claim Asserts
- How it worksHow does a causal claim draw as an arrow between two events rather than a line between two columns?
- Worked exampleWalk me through pulling the exact cause and exact effect out of 'Cities that added bike lanes saw fewer crashes'.
- Common mistakeWhy doesn't a case with the cause present and the effect missing leave a causal conclusion untouched?
- Going furtherWhat changes when the causal claim is about one single event instead of a whole population?
Correlation Is Not Causation
- How it worksHow does a pair of rising lines get redrawn four different ways using exactly the same data?
- Worked exampleWalk me through the leap in 'Students who eat breakfast score higher, so breakfast raises scores'.
- Common mistakeWhy isn't a very tight correlation any better evidence of causation than a loose one?
- Going furtherWhat changes about the leap when the numbers come from a controlled experiment instead of a survey?
Reversed Causation
- How it worksHow does a correlation survive completely intact when you flip its arrow end for end?
- Worked exampleWalk me through reversing the arrow in 'Confident speakers get promoted, so confidence earns promotions'.
- Common mistakeWhy doesn't the cause being mentioned first prove that it came first in the world?
The Third Cause
- How it worksHow does one hidden cause feeding two arrows manufacture a correlation between its own effects?
- Worked exampleWalk me through finding the common cause behind 'Towns with more churches also have more bars'.
- Common mistakeWhy doesn't ruling out a reversed arrow leave causation as the last option standing?
- Going furtherWhat happens to the common-cause objection when a study already controlled for income and age?
Coincidence and Unrepresentative Samples
- How it worksHow does a small or self-selected group manufacture a pattern the whole population does not have?
- Going furtherWhat changes when the pattern was spotted first and the hypothesis written up afterwards?
- Worked exampleWalk me through the sampling problem in 'Nine of our ten happiest customers use the app daily'.
- Common mistakeWhy isn't a huge sample automatically a representative one?
Strengthening a Causal Argument
- How it worksHow do the three classic strengtheners work: kill an alternative, repeat the result, remove the cause?
- Worked exampleFind what most strengthens 'The new lamp cut errors, since errors fell after we installed it'.
- Worked exampleWalk me through why 'a second factory saw the identical drop' props up a causal claim about the first.
- Common mistakeWhy doesn't an answer that simply repeats the correlation add any support at all?
- Going furtherWhat changes when a strengthener rules out an alternative that nobody had even raised?
Weakening a Causal Argument
- How it worksHow does supplying an alternative cause weaken a conclusion while contradicting no stated fact?
- Worked exampleFind what most weakens 'Sleeping eight hours caused the team's eleven-game win streak'.
- Worked exampleWalk me through weakening 'Music lessons raise test scores' by turning the arrow around.
- Common mistakeWhy isn't one case of the effect without the cause always enough to sink the claim?
- Going furtherWhat happens to a weakener when the conclusion is hedged down to 'probably contributed to'?
Causal Language Hidden in Ordinary Verbs
- How it worksHow do verbs like 'leads to', 'produces' and 'drives' quietly install an arrow inside a sentence?
- Worked exampleWalk me through spotting the buried causal claim in 'Longer recess gives students sharper focus'.
- Common mistakeWhy doesn't a conclusion phrased as 'is associated with' carry the same burden as 'causes'?
- Going furtherWhat changes about your attack when a conclusion says 'helped cause' rather than 'caused'?
AP®, SAT® and PSAT/NMSQT® are trademarks registered by the College Board (PSAT/NMSQT® jointly with the National Merit Scholarship Corporation). ACT® is a registered trademark of ACT Education Corp. GRE® is a registered trademark of ETS. LSAT® is a registered trademark of the Law School Admission Council. MCAT® is a registered trademark of the Association of American Medical Colleges. ISEE® and SSAT® are registered trademarks of their owners. None of these organizations is affiliated with, or endorses, Jentoo.