JentooACT®

ACT® · English: Knowledge of Language — Concision and Redundancy

Wordiness Involving Fairly Sophisticated Language (KLA 602)

Fancy-sounding phrases like "the outlook of an aesthetic viewpoint" often just restate one simple idea in dressed-up words. The fix is to find the single word or short phrase that carries the exact same meaning and cut the rest.

Long, formal-sounding phrases can hide a one-word idea. 'Outlook' and 'viewpoint' both mean the same thing, so 'the outlook of an aesthetic viewpoint' is really just 'aesthetically' wearing a costume. This happens because abstract nouns stack easily: each one sounds like it is adding a new layer of meaning, but often it is just renaming the noun next to it. The test rewards you for seeing past the sophisticated vocabulary and asking what single word or short phrase says exactly the same thing with nothing left over.

The method is always the same: strip the phrase down to the one fact or condition it actually states, then find the shortest wording for that fact. 'In the event that circumstances should happen to arise' states one condition — something might happen — so 'if necessary' says it completely. This sits next to other concision rules in the unit: synonym pairs get cut, and so do padded clauses that only restate a simple 'if' or 'because'. The test never punishes you for choosing the shorter version once meaning is checked and confirmed equal.

The one case where cutting goes too far is when the 'inflated' phrase is actually a definition of a term the essay plans to reuse. If an essay introduces 'residence time' and then defines it, that definition earns its length because the reader needs it once. Keep definitions and technical setups; cut only the restatements and synonym stacks that add words without adding information.

Key terms

Redundancy
Saying the same idea twice using different words, such as 'outlook' and 'viewpoint' together.
Concision
Stating a complete meaning in the fewest words possible without losing information.
Abstract noun stacking
Piling up vague nouns like 'outlook,' 'viewpoint,' or 'aspect' that each rename the same idea.
Definition exception
A longer phrase is kept, not cut, when it defines a technical term the essay will use again.

Watch it explained

  1. How it worksHow do abstract nouns stack into a phrase that collapses down to one concrete term?
  2. Worked exampleFind the two-word version of 'in the event that circumstances should happen to arise'.
  3. Going furtherWhat changes when the inflated phrase is the essay's own technical term?
  4. Common mistakeWhy isn't formal vocabulary a sign that a phrase has earned the space it takes up?

Check yourself

Your turnmedium1 of 3
An art-history essay about a painter who worked for 44 years reads: 'Her late canvases are best understood from the outlook of an aesthetic viewpoint.' Which choice for the underlined portion 'from the outlook of an aesthetic viewpoint' is most concise while keeping the meaning?

End of topic.