AP® United States History · Unit 4 · Topic 4.8

Indian Removal and the Trail of Tears

Indian Removal was the federal policy, backed by cotton-hungry settlers, that forced the Cherokee and four other southeastern nations west in the 1830s, even after the Cherokee won their case in the Supreme Court.

Cotton was spreading across the Deep South, and planters and speculators wanted the fertile land that the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole nations held. Georgia pushed hardest, passing laws that erased Cherokee sovereignty within its borders. In 1830 Congress answered the pressure with the Indian Removal Act, giving the president power to negotiate treaties trading Native land in the Southeast for territory west of the Mississippi, in what became Oklahoma. Andrew Jackson, who saw removal as both a states'-rights concession and a path to white settlement, pushed it through and signed it into law.

The Cherokee fought back in court instead of by force. In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Supreme Court ruled that Georgia's laws had no authority inside Cherokee territory, which was a legally distinct nation under federal, not state, protection. It was a clear legal victory, but the ruling meant nothing without enforcement, and Jackson's administration had no intention of stopping Georgia or the removal process. A faction of Cherokee leaders signed the Treaty of New Echota in 1835, ceding Cherokee land without the consent of the elected tribal government, and the federal government used it to justify forced removal. In 1838 the army marched roughly 16,000 Cherokee west; about 4,000 died of cold, disease, and starvation on what became known as the Trail of Tears. The Seminoles resisted differently, fighting a guerrilla war in the Florida swamps from 1835 to 1842, the longest and costliest of the removal conflicts, before most were forced west.

Key terms

Indian Removal Act (1830)
Federal law authorizing the president to negotiate treaties exchanging Native land in the Southeast for territory west of the Mississippi.
Worcester v. Georgia (1832)
Supreme Court case ruling that Georgia's state laws had no authority within Cherokee territory, which was a sovereign nation.
Treaty of New Echota (1835)
Treaty signed by a minority Cherokee faction ceding tribal land, used by the federal government to justify forced removal.
Trail of Tears
The 1838-1839 forced march of the Cherokee to Indian Territory, during which about 4,000 died.
Indian Territory
Land west of the Mississippi, mostly in present-day Oklahoma, designated for relocated Native nations.

Watch it explained

  1. How it worksWalk me through Worcester v. Georgia and what happened after the Court ruled.
  2. Worked exampleTrace the Cherokee removal routes west to Indian Territory and the death toll along them.
  3. How it worksHow does the Indian Removal Act turn cotton demand into a federal deportation policy?
  4. Going furtherWhat happens to the Seminoles when removal meets a swamp and a seven-year war?

Check yourself

Your turn1 of 2
In Worcester v. Georgia (1832), the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Nation was a sovereign entity and that Georgia's state laws did not apply within Cherokee territory, yet the Cherokee were still forcibly removed from their land later in the decade. What does this outcome most directly reveal about the limits of a Supreme Court ruling?

End of topic.